Intel i5 & i9 10th Gen


Intel i5 & i9 10th Gen


It has been almost 10 months since the launch of amd's third generation ryzen processor sand it crapped everywhere intel we all knew it of course intel was sitting there hoping that their coffee lake cpus just like the 9900k would compete against the simplest that AMD had to supply but that wasn't enough of course what they're trying to try and do immediately is come up with another 14nm called comet lake but look all jokes aside i want to level with you guys intel won't publicly admit it but they know their new desktop cpus are during a really bad place right away they're doing everything they possibly can to prevent bleeding until a brand new architecture and a brand new manufacturing process is prepared remember amd had to travel through this year’s again fact that they had to last six years on 32 meters untimely arrived and what's really interesting is that this is often the sixth year that intel is on 40 manometers but let's also not forget that the fx series from amd was targeted towards the market that was more value focused which kept fans happy one among intel major problem sis nearly every single one in all amd's 3rd gen ryzen processors are on sale right away this is not a political candidate price cutting but instill makes things look very different right now than when comet lake was first announced some weeks ago so can intel overcome that we're getting ready to know my friends but first a fast message from our sponsor the new fan tax p300a enclosure is great value airflow focused frame due to the all new mesh front panel that's one piece of metal for highest mesh area and sturdiness the within is good and easy plus an fan is included try the p300a down below alright so this video goes to be more benchmark focused and if you are looking for more information about the architecture and about the processors that intel has announced confirm to test out our explained video I've made an ardent one covering all of the new cpus and you'll be able to check it out right up here although they are going to be almost large integer new comet lake cpus available today intel sent us two of them.



The core i9 10900k which is that the flagship and therefore the core i5 10600k a cheaper option both are completely unlocked for over clocking but where they find yourself against amd is extremely interesting you see the core i910900k is replacing the i9 9900k with more cores and better clock speeds but with a price of 490 it's up against pretty tough competitor and that is the ryzen 9 3900x which usually goes for about 500 but lately i have been seeing it floating around for between and 440 it'll be interesting to work out if those sales continue and if it actually does intel goes to be fighting an uphill battle against a processor that encompasses a efficient manufacturing process with more threats and a far cheaper price tag as for the i5-10600k well as a replacement for the 9600k it's pretty good by offering double the quantity of 10600k winds up almost hitting the identical price because the um yeah the eight core16 thread ryzen 7 3700x which accustomed hit the 330 mark but prices have dropped below 300 now there are some things that i need to say about these prices before going from now on first of all sales don't last forever therefore the ryzen 3000s might rise in cost but I’m not entirely sure this also a number of them are pretty old as fares processors go and amd did say that they're going to launch the zen 3 this year so until next gen ryzen cps roll outhits is that the perfect opportunity to stay those prices low and really put the hurt on intel now as for intel prices let's just say that i'll believe them after I see them online so take that with a grain of salt another thing i would like to speak about is clock speeds because on these new cpus there's a large amount of variables when it involves hitting intel advertised frequencies especially with the core i9-10900k it actually contains a ton of various frequencies many of which you've probably seen on past intel cpus and every one of them are keen about variables like power temperatures and workload so there's a base frequency of three.7 gigahertz and also the usual turbo boost 2.0 which may bring one core up to five.1 gigahertz turbo boost 3.0 then enhances the aptitude by finding the fastest core and boosting that one to even further to five.2 gigahertz in single threaded workloads then.


There's all core turbo frequency of4.8 gigahertz which is that the theoretical maximum sustained clock speed when all cores and threads are fully loaded the new addition here is what intel calls thermal velocity boost and it takes frequencies to the following level but only in very short bursts on your cpu's two best core sand under strict circumstances it'll only be enabled if these cpu temp sis 70 degrees Celsius or less and therefore the cpu's power package allows for higher speeds speaking of these boost levels i should also mention that every motherboard manufacturer encompasses a different way of addressing them and plenty of tend to work outside of intel predefined limits so as an example asus automatically. The periods of your time we always persist with intel's predefined stock settings so let's examine what that translates to interns of clock speeds first of all you'll see here that the 2 best course on the 10900k I’ve got up here is number four and number five those are the sole ones that'll hit 5.3 gigahertz on a single core by charting temperatures and clock speeds over time on one core you'll see that speeds hitting that gigahertz mark but only occasionally this might only tell half the story though since our one second polling rate likely isn't reading some millisecond changes in speeds the 10900k may be hitting the high ratio more often than we see but if you look towards the middle of the chart temperatures on this core rose a touch which likely meant another windows process started eating up some resources. I’m using here things got interesting temperature spiked before the warmth sink fans could catch up then again they leveled out way under intel's 70 degree threshold for thermal velocity boost as for clock speedwell the primary 30 seconds shows clocks hitting really impressive speeds as intel's short duration power limit gives a more relaxed setting but that also caused the temperature to extend nineteenth's long duration power limit sets in and frequencies and temperatures got a nosedive with the 10900k varying between 4.1and 4.2 gigahertz.


But what happens once we add more cooling would the chips lodge in higher speeds well i stuck two fans running 100% on These us and therefore the temperatures never got above degrees Celsius which should mean we'd hit higher average clock speeds right well no afterward short burst of speed it leveled out around 4.2 gigahertz again which sway under intel's 4.8 gigahertz claim but there's nothing new this seems to be more about package power limits instead of temperatures getting intel cpus to hit their turbo frequencies on a continuing basis usually involves over clocking and what about the 10600k well it doesn't have thermal velocity boost or turbo boost max 3.0 and its-behavior was quite different it's all core speeds remained really consistent over the course of the test so now that we've got a far better understanding of how these cpus behave let's dive into the benchmarks but before that I’ll pause here for a touch with great care you'll re-examine our test system configuration so be at liberty to pause reassess all the setups yeah okay so starting with singleness core and this can be one area where intel has always been strong while amd has made some really big steps towards improving their performance here but moving on to multi-core workload and well intel's comet lake could be a big improvement over their previous generation but compared to amd it just isn't enough one in all the largest concerns here is that the 10600k which has the identical number of processing threads because the 3600x still falls short moving on to world testing the primary thing that i wanted to tackle is adobe premiere province it has been through a pair of really important revisions lately that we wanted to speak about. Here intel's pane is pretty evident and while the 10900k loses the 10600k gets absolutely cream edit barely offers any better performance than the 9600k this next test shows.



How currently intel can leverage their quick sync feature to accelerate video encoding sure their cpus are ahead but look a touch closer and there is obviously no reason to spend more cash on an i9 since the integrated graphics module becomes the bottleneck but adobe has been pretty busy lately rolling out hardware acceleration for over just intel in its latest release and 14.3 beta both amd and nvidia gpus are ready to offer hardware acceleration which can} even the playing fielding a giant way let's take a glance at how that turns outwit an rtx 2080 ti installed so this came as a touch of a surprise Whitely has completely lost their massive lead they're still able to stay prior to amd why let's drill down a small amount to work out what's actually happening here you'll see that within the current hardware accelerated build the intel gpu is accountable for video decoding the nvidia card takes care of some copying tasks and therefore the cpu crunches through encoding and a bunch of other things switching over to the 14.3 beta allows every resource to be properly utilized in parallel which means video encode is being done by nvidia's and bank encoder the intel graphics takes care of decoding and also the cpu continues to be being employed but plenty but before that the integrated gpu remains used here and allows comet lake to remain before by a touch this also makes me really interested to work out how amd's gpus do he removing on to resolve and here the intel cpus are pretty competitive but not by all that much the close results are because this program is de fact gpu dependent when its hardware acceleration is enabled basically you have got the gpu working away at almost 100 while the cpus only pander to light workloads as for the remainder of tests well what you see here isa really similar situation playing out again and again in any situation where there's an all-core load amd completely dominates anything intel can give meanwhile in mixed workloads such as you find in some programs.



Intel stays ahead but really not by all that much for instance would i buy the ten900k or the 10600k over the 3900x or the 3600x for something shapeliness well supported Andy's current prices absolutely not because the ryzen series would give me more quality core flexibility for other programs too instead of just being strong in one area as a matter of fact reckoning on where the 10 600 case retail price lands it'd have a very big problem with the 3700x even for lightly threaded workloads switching to blender it is a switch back to the pain game foretell versus amd but to their benefit the new i9 and i5 corpus offer lots more performance than coffee lake that'll be a giant deal for inlet buyers and applications like auto desk may abut beat all it just looks like amd contains a better rounded lineup that balances multi-core domination with excellent single core results moving on to gaming and this is often a part where intel claims their i910900k is that the fastest cpu that has ever been create dwell let's put those claims to the test and yeah it's like these results really do put things into perspective don’t they modern warfare does seem to actually like high core counts and speeds but it is the only game within the situation mean sure the 10900k and also the 10600k do provide specific frame rates but those small chart differences doesn't cause subjectively better experience in any way even the common fraction lows are pretty identical across the board i could have loaded things in intel's favor by bench marking at an occasional resolution but that's just not a practical situation for somebody spending many doll arson a cpu because it stands we're using the foremost powerful gpu on the market at once and using it at 1080p yeah it just it still becomes a bottleneck look if you merely need a system for gaming purposes avoid the 10900k the 3900x the 3700x the10600k or the other high-end cpu for that matter just get yourself an inexpensive processor and maximize on your graphics card budget and thank us later so thereupon out of the way i believe it is time to tackle something that plenty of individuals were concerned about.



When they heard intel was visiting push higher core counts and better frequencies on the identical old manometer process which is temperatures and power consumption back at the start of this video we've already seen that temperatures are fairly manageable with an honest air cooler just like the nocturnal u12s it also seems like intel throttles their clock speeds supported power consumption instead of heat so what does that actually mean well taking a glance at the package power over time it really conveys a noteworthy story starting with the 10900k and already there is a problem that was evident earlier this thing sucks down an enormous amount of electricity within the first 30 seconds of all core load yep that's about 225 watt sand since most synthetic benchmarks like cine bench don't take that long to finish this out-of-spec behavior will artificially inflate shorelines luckily this may not impact our results since most of our tests are real-world scenarios that take ages to finish now at that time huge boos it’s almost like an algorithm saying whoops i should not be doing this and stamped things back in line to the rated 125 watts remember this is often supposedly an intel's defaults with none motherboard specific enhancements enabled but watching this makes me wonder if the asus board isn't still doing something behind the scenes now taking a glance at the 10600k and since it doesn't have the turbo boost max 3.0 or thermal velocity boost its behaviors plenty more predictable it remains flat 100 watts through the complete test and what does that mean for power consumption of the entire system.



Well over the course of a 15-minute test both of these processors are relatively efficient all things considered but rather like we saw there is a lot more to that could totally throw off power supply calculations and it may push less capable heat sinks right off the sting on it note i believe it is time to finish this review while the addition of recent core sand threads make these new cpus a small amount more competitive in my opinion it's insufficient and way too late because intel had the chance to prevent their bleeding back when coffee lake was launched but instead it absolutely was the identical old endless identical refreshes intrinsically buried their heads in sand undercut by some amd cpu sales it is also coupled to a z490 platform which brings absolutely nothing unaccustomed the table but what if they're wearing any sales well i'd still recommend the ryzen 93900x over the core i9 10900k because it's just a flexible all-round processor the identical story goes for the 3600xi still recommend that cpu over the core i510 600k competition is sweet though so i assume the simplest thing i can say about these new processors is they're causing lower inflation and hopefully. 
Thanks to read my article.


Post a Comment

0 Comments